Author Topic: Obama's Socialist Agenda  (Read 10793 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline johnnydollar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 429
    • View Profile
Re: Obama's Socialist Agenda
« Reply #45 on: October 25, 2012, 01:01:00 PM »
Everybody has an opinion. Go vote.

By the way, the budget was balanced until George Bush was elected in 2000 and cut taxes while at the same time increasing spending dramatically. So please do not blame the democrats for budgets that are not balanced. Both sides spend more than we take in. However, Romney believes cutting taxes can lead to a balanced budget. Please show me when was the last time that happened?


Offline Drofdeb

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
    • View Profile
Re: Obama's Socialist Agenda
« Reply #46 on: October 26, 2012, 09:04:45 PM »
grhtex,
You are the aspirin for the headache that I acquired while reading this thread.  Some of the posters need to do further research as to the opinions that they posted.  Several times in recent history a cut in Federal taxes have bolstered the economy and fueled a massive expansion expansion.  I love the argument for a bottom up approach.  If I understand the concept correctly, the mere fact that we suddenly create 5,000,000 educated and motivated workers will somehow stimulate an employer to invest his assets in order to create a product and jobs for them. This is contrary to the economic pressures of a world economy.  For the disbelievers I would suggest that you research the following; General motors is presently in negotiations for moving more of their production to China, Fiat was scolded this week by the White House for openly discussing moving the manufacturing of Jeeps to Italy before the election.   Food for thought: What car driven on American roads contains the largest % of American made parts?  The answer is a KIA!
We are about to revisit an economy that was the standard under Jimmy Carter and Herbert Hoover and we keep drinking the "Cool Aid".  I love the Health care Bill and its impact on most working contributors.  When will they be told that their employer's contribution to their families health care cost will suddenly appear on their pay stubs and they will have been taxed for that benefit as compensation?  When will they be told that if they change employers after 2013 that they will be denied the right to join the new employers health care program and must join the Federal plan or pay a harsh penalty?  When will they be told that any employer can shed their health care costs by simply paying a $750.00 fine per employ to the government?
I leave you with a plagiarized comment of our first Republican president. "Eleven score and 16 years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing weather that nation or any nation, so conceived and so dedicated can long endure."
So long and thanks for all the fish.

Offline signal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 520
    • View Profile
Re: Obama's Socialist Agenda
« Reply #47 on: October 27, 2012, 04:02:05 PM »
    Having said that Pres. Obama is no more socialist than FDR
or LBJ, I thought I might add that although I voted for him four
years ago, this time I am voting for Romney. Don't get me
wrong, on most domestic issues I am liberal. However, I really
think that we could end up like Greece - needing a bailout, if
we do not curb Federal deficit spending.
    If Pres. Obama's policies had turned things around, with
6% unemployment or less, then most people would say it was
expensive, but worth it. Right now it's just expensive.
    Mitt Romney could be too conservative, but I'm taking a
chance that there will be a healthier business climate (and
therefore more jobs) with his policies than what we have now.

Offline BUZZARDCS

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
    • View Profile
Re: Obama's Socialist Agenda
« Reply #48 on: October 27, 2012, 06:41:50 PM »
I simply can not understand how many "Guppies" are STILL out there feeding off of this Democratic propaganda.  I've been sitting back looking at all these posts trying to understand what you Guppies can possibly see that Obama has done for any of us.  It's been four years folks, HELLO!!!! But I DO see the majority of the posts are becoming aware and  informed in the past few months.  Number one above all things, Obama's a liar! He let our Ambassador DIE, he let our Marines DIE while begging for help, and then watched it all happen via a drone in  real time! He's not gonna tell you that now, but Hillarie and Obama will be held accountable for our people's deaths. And what's President Crybaby and his village idiot Biden been doing? Blaming this mess on everyone but themselves and going on talk shows, late night comedies, etc. etc. smoozing for the votes from people who don't know what they'd be voting for anyway, except to say that he's "one of us", and we're entitled to our "free stuff", so we'll vote for him. What??????   Obama, you've had your four freaken years to turn this around and have done NOTHING  except blame everyone else.  DUH?   And if  YOU still buy  into ANY of his crap over the last four years,  U  R  A  Guppie!  But be carefull Guppies, big fish eat you!  Swim fast little Guppies, swim fast!

Offline Buddy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 326
    • View Profile
Re: Obama's Socialist Agenda
« Reply #49 on: October 30, 2012, 08:02:54 AM »
BUZZARDS, Ok let's say you are correct.  How long did the Bush family get to screw it all up.  They had a chance to continue on with a balanced budget, but oh no we wouldn't want that.  Yet since the republicans control congress and refuse to vote for what Obama believes will work, why is it Obama's fault?  He only had four years to try and straighten out the mess left by that family, REALLY!

So let's say that Romney gets voted in, does he only get four years?  What if the democrats control congress if Romney wins?  He may not get his way either and then all of you who vote for him would say it was the fault of the congress, not Romney.

No one here has changed my mind, I'm still voting for Obama.  If Romney wins, so be it the people, or possibly the electoral college, have spoken.   

Offline StopTheBurning

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1681
    • View Profile
Re: Obama's Socialist Agenda
« Reply #50 on: October 30, 2012, 08:36:27 AM »
And people want to forget Obama had democrat majority in both the house and senate the first two years and could have rammed through anything they wanted.  But they didn't fix anything.  They just blamed republicans for saying NO.  Well their NO didn't mean anything because they were in the minority.

Offline Nikki

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
    • View Profile
Re: Obama's Socialist Agenda
« Reply #51 on: October 30, 2012, 10:37:21 AM »
Amen Buddy!  and Buzzard, here's a guppie with a memory!  George W Bush got us into this mess!  4 years isn't enough time to fix what Bushie did.  WAKE UP! Obama isn't perfect but Romney is pretty scary and all he cares about is tax cuts for the wealthy. 

Offline StopTheBurning

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1681
    • View Profile
Re: Obama's Socialist Agenda
« Reply #52 on: October 30, 2012, 10:45:25 AM »
Well I guess i'll take tax cuts for the wealth over free everything for  50% of American that is feeling entitled under obama.

Offline hmp

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
    • View Profile
Re: Obama's Socialist Agenda
« Reply #53 on: October 30, 2012, 10:49:32 AM »
I'm still voting for Obama. Romney has no convictions. He will do or say anything to get elected. No one knows where he really stands.

Offline chartres

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 157
    • View Profile
Re: Obama's Socialist Agenda
« Reply #54 on: October 30, 2012, 12:05:09 PM »
HMP, you can't say "no one know where he stands", I know exactly where Romney stands and that why he has my vote. You have to stop listening to the Democrat lies, get on Google and do your own research. As for how you can increase spending while cutting taxes without raising the deficit, it's easy, a vigorous economy. Our personal income taxes account for a minute amount of Federal revenues, get the economy churning again and the tariffs, corporate taxes, excise taxes will roll in, these are the taxes that really account for the bulk of our revenue. A vigorous economy will never happen under Obama's regulation heavy administration. His intention is to kill incentive and get everyone under the governments thumb financially. He who controls the purse strings, control the person.