I like the concept of a "flip-flopper", I don't like someone who's views and policies are so entrenched in his ego that he will not change them even when good evidence is presented to the contrary. I hold all of my views to be right, but when presented with new facts, I will change them if the facts bear that out. So what is wrong with Romney changing his position on issues in relation to new evidence being brought to the table? I thought that is what "keeping an open mind" is all about. Everything Romney has had an involvement with has turned to gold, I do believe he will set this country on the right path to future prosperity once again, or would you rather have another four years like the last four, more giveaways, higher debt, more executive orders rather than laws passed by Congress. One comment stated that Congress introduces bills and passes them and that the President can do nothing without them, well this President has done more by "Executive Order" than any before him. Now before I get comments back about how many "Executive Orders" other Presidents signed, it's not about how many, it's about the content of those orders. Obama stated that if he can't do it with Congress, he will do it on his own, and that smacks of dictatorship.